Auto-approved
Show the math (every factor is made up)
Constraint rulings
Nothing silently passes. A skipped condition, a failed bound and a real pass are three different rows. Errors block generation; warnings flag for the verifier.
| Constraint | Ruling | Actual | Valid | Severity |
|---|
Declarations in this session
The reference was verified once, together with the model. Everything below it is a fresh run of that model, checked against the envelope.
One family, many SKUs, one verified model
Green: checked against every constraint, auto-approved, sampled under the program's policy. Amber: inside the envelope with a flag, goes to a verifier. Red: outside the envelope, cannot be generated; a person makes a coverage determination.
Where a scaling factor holds, and where it stops
Values
The scaling table (a reporting device)
Which parameters actually matter
Each bar moves one input across its verified envelope while the others stay where the Playground has them. The hairline is the current product.
Values
What to do with it
Long bar: collect primary data and set a tight constraint. Short bar: a defensible default and a wide bound are enough.
When a verified model pays for itself
Illustrative round numbers. Replace them with your own quotes; the shape is the point, not the figures.
Values
Read it honestly
Below the crossover, verify one at a time and say so. Above it, the one-at-a-time approach stops being viable, and the fixed cost is spent on the system instead of on N nearly identical documents. The same portfolio can need two reference declarations or eight depending on how the model was built, so the crossover moves with modeling discipline.